Insure Catastrophes, Not Inconveniences
Insurance generates more confusion per dollar than almost any financial product, and one principle resolves most of it: insure the losses you couldn't absorb; self-insure the ones you could. Insurance is, mechanically, a losing bet on average — premiums fund payouts plus the insurer's costs and profit, so the expected value is negative by construction. Buying it is rational for exactly one class of risk: the catastrophe — the loss that would break you (Emergency Buffer Sizing's cascade, at ruin scale) — where the negative expected value purchases something worth more than the difference: the capping of your downside. For losses you could absorb — the inconvenience tier — the same negative expected value buys nothing you needed, which makes over-insuring small risks a quiet standing leak (The Extraction Economy's economics, wearing protection's clothes).
Insure big: liability (lawsuits are the unbounded tail — auto and umbrella liability limits deserve more attention than they get), income (disability insurance — one of the more widely underbought coverages relative to its risk: Social Security Administration data shows roughly 1 in 4 of today's 20-year-olds will experience a disability lasting a year or more before reaching retirement age, yet well under half of civilian workers have employer disability coverage and only about 1 in 5 adults own an individual policy1 — your earning power is most households' largest asset, and Optimism, Restraint, and the Cost of Compounding's optimism bias is why it goes unprotected), life (term, sized to dependents' needs — High-Commission Insurance Products settled the term-vs-whole-life economics), health (catastrophic medical costs being the classic un-absorbable), and dwelling (the home's full replacement).
Self-insure small: the phone, the appliance, the trip, the minor collision — the extended-warranty tier (Buying a Car's F&I room lives here) where the buffer is the correct insurer: it pays no premiums, charges no deductibles, and covers everything. The structural link: every dollar of buffer raises your self-insurance capacity — which is why growing households rationally raise deductibles as the buffer grows (trading premium for retained small-risk, a strictly-good trade once the buffer can absorb the deductible) and drop the small-loss riders entirely.
The Negotiating and Eliminating Bills sweep, pointed at coverage: annually, list every policy and rider with its annualized premium (the framing habit); check the big five above for gaps (the catastrophes uninsured); check the small tier for waste (the inconveniences over-insured); re-shop the shoppable (Negotiating and Eliminating Bills's price-optimization defense). The pattern the audit typically finds is the principle inverted — warranties on gadgets, low deductibles, comprehensive-everything on old cars, and no disability coverage, thin liability limits: paying retail to insure what the buffer covers free, while the actual catastrophes ride bare.
Insurance is for catastrophes: cap the unbounded downsides — liability, income, life for dependents, health, dwelling — and let the buffer self-insure the inconveniences. Raise deductibles as the buffer grows, skip the warranty tier, audit annually with premiums annualized — and let the expected-value loss buy the only thing it's ever worth buying: a floor under ruin.
Plenee Academy provides financial information and education, not personalized financial advice. Plenee Co. is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. Legal Disclosures & Notices →